I Get By With Alittle Help From My Friends....
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
I Get By With Alittle Help From My Friends....

Dinar Outcast


You are not connected. Please login or register

LAPD limits impounding of unlicensed drivers' cars

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

gente

gente




LAPD limits impounding of unlicensed drivers' cars




Previous policy for sobriety checkpoints had been criticized by immigration advocacy groups.
March 12, 2011|By Joel Rubin and Ari Bloomekatz, Los Angeles TimesUnder criticism that it was unfairly targeting undocumented immigrants, the Los Angeles Police Department on Friday announced changes to its rules for impounding cars of unlicensed drivers at sobriety checkpoints.

Previously, LAPD officers at such checkpoints followed stringent protocols that called for them to impound a car whenever the driver was found not to have a valid license, regardless of whether the driver had been drinking.


Those rules have drawn the ire of immigration advocacy groups that said they disproportionately targeted undocumented immigrants, who are not able to obtain licenses legally in nearly all U.S. states. Once a vehicle is impounded, law enforcement agencies often require it to remain locked up for at least a month and charge the owner hefty fees to release it.

The new LAPD guidelines soften the department's stance somewhat. Police will be required to make an attempt to contact the registered owner of the stopped vehicle. If the owner is a licensed driver and can respond to the checkpoint in "a reasonable period of time," the officers will release the car to him or her. If the owner is unlicensed, officers will permit another person who is a licensed driver to take the car.

If no one with a license is available, police will impound a vehicle. In any case, police will issue a citation to the unlicensed driver.

Police Chief Charlie Beck said that since he took over the department more than a year ago, the checkpoint policy had "stuck in my craw as one of the things we weren't doing the right way." Beck said he decided to make the change after immigration rights advocates raised the issue with him anew in meetings this week.

"I'm tired of casting the net so wide," he said. "This is the right thing to do. There is a fairness issue here … and we're trying to balance the needs of all segments of our community and keep the roads safe."

The new rules, Beck said, were an attempt to mitigate somewhat "the current reality, which is that for a vast number of people, who are a valuable asset to our community and who have very limited resources, their ability to live and work in L.A. is severely limited by their immigration status."

The change, which the department announced in a news release late Friday afternoon, is likely to anger groups that support strict enforcement of immigration laws. Efforts to contact representatives of several of those groups for comment were unsuccessful.

The issue of impounds has become a controversial topic in recent years. Police in the small cities of Bell and Maywood have been accused of systematically targeting undocumented immigrants when impounding cars in an effort to boost municipal revenues.

Ron Gochez, a member of the steering committee for the Southern California Immigration Coalition, expressed limited praise for the LAPD's change but questioned why the department needed to impound a car if the driver had not been drinking.

"It's a step in the right direction, but it still falls short of what we're asking for," he said. "We're not against checkpoints. We want checkpoints to happen, we want drunk drivers off our streets. We just don't want people to be losing their cars who aren't drunk."


windreader1



Fast way to fill up the auto pound

Panhead

Panhead
Admin

to me the checkpoints are unconstitutional anyway....but if illegals are getting caught.....too bad, why is it an issue all of a sudden?

windreader1



unlicensed also means no insurance, some of my best arrests were from traffic stops, good way to get the bad guys off the street

Panhead

Panhead
Admin

concur Wind....but there is a big difference between a traffic stop and checkpoints...

windreader1



but I also liked the checkpoints

Panhead

Panhead
Admin

so much for "probable cause"......wonder if anyone will show concern when we have a policeman on every corner checking your credentials
for walking down the street?
How are checkpoints any different?.....

One refreshing thing about working in Texas....there wasn't an overbearing police presence like here.

windreader1



Whether we agree or not it is a sign of the times. If it gets a drunk driver off the road I am all for it. I spent almost 10 years investigating fatality traffic accidents. It has a way of changing your viewpoint. A high percentage of drivers in both fatality and non-fatality accidents do not have a driver license or insurance. Which means if you get hit your insurance company has to pick up the tab. Guess what happens to your insurance rates. Unlicensed drivers also represent a driving hazard due to the fact that they have never learned the rules of the road for operating a motor vehicle. For years truckers have had to go through checkpoints to weigh their trucks, inspect their rigs and check their paperwork. Look at it this way, checkpoints are less intrusive than what you have to go through at an airport to get on a plane.

Panhead

Panhead
Admin

Wind...I'm not advocating drinking and driving or anything illegal....just pointing out that all too often things starting out as a good thing get translated differently in the future(happens all to often with our government)

here's a novel thought....how about utilizing the funding and overtime for these "checkpoints" to be set up on the border to stem the illegal
border crossings......

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum