I Get By With Alittle Help From My Friends....
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
I Get By With Alittle Help From My Friends....

Dinar Outcast


You are not connected. Please login or register

Iraq regain its sovereignty and part of the withdrawal is a double edged sword

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

Iraq regain its sovereignty and part of the withdrawal is a double edged sword
Friday, 03 July 2009 07:32 Administrator
Baghdad \ follow-up news
Iraqis began last Tuesday and the first real step in the restoration of sovereignty of their country in a formal American occupation, which violated the right, without the UN mandate in the brutal aggression against Iraq in 2003 allegedly to rid Iraq and the region of weapons of mass destruction that turned out to be false and which also led to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and then the destruction and looting of the wealth of Iraq and the killing and displacement of its people. This step has been the withdrawal of American occupation forces from all Iraqi cities and towns, and return to military bases near such cities as the security agreement signed between the Governments of Iraq and the United States at the end of last year.
Although the Iraqi government and many political forces prepared to have to celebrate this remarkable day in the new Iraq, but the celebrations preceded the bloodiest attacks, Iraq has not seen anything like it for more than a year. When it was blown up several vehicles and motorcycles bomb belts and explosive devices in several cities in Iraq, which introduced many fears in the minds of Iraqi citizens, as well as the political forces of the possibility of deterioration of the security situation in the country and the approaching collapse of the result of the inability of Iraqi forces that are still lacking for many components needed in the face of the challenges that surround them.
There are more than one reason, and essential role in the political and security situations in Iraq will appear after the U.S. withdrawal will try to address these reasons in detail on this subject.
We can divide the possibilities of the political situation in Iraq after the U.S. withdrawal from the cities into two parts, the first, which includes the Iraqi government and its supporting forces and Iraqi security forces operating Bomrtha, because it may never be told so in the separation of the political side of the security forces. The second part represents those who do not want a withdrawal and did not publicly state on this subject, but they are afraid of the new developments of the situation in the country, especially those which had very significant gains, thanks to the presence of occupation forces in Iraq.
The withdrawal of occupation forces from Iraqi cities and towns is a major victory for the Iraqi government and those who supported this requirement, since, as we have such a withdrawal would represent a first step towards the restoration of Iraq's sovereignty undervalued. Therefore, the Iraqi government will pull a double-edged sword. It is either removed from the shares in the forthcoming elections if they had succeeded in providing better security than the existing form or, as was the situation before the months from now at least, because the Iraqi people now put all its security and stability is the key to all things life, because it without security and stability can not be clear of the path of the country and the citizen at the same time to move. There is another aspect to the extent of this weapon that the existence of security and stability and the absence of the occupation forces in the streets of Iraq as it was before, which would make the Iraqis feel safe and secure and real sovereignty, because these forces are a major burden on the Iraqi citizen, whether sitting or sleeping in the home or present in the place of business or in the street, they arrest and kill and destroy and cut off roads as mood. There is a lot of Iraqis did not say that most of them feel that the presence of American forces on the territory of their country is a massive violation of their dignity, because it forces the occupation, even though the troop-called friend of the government or some political forces, as the pace of history has always emphasized that the occupation and colonialism, and the two sides the same coin, it was not Qamosh such thing as a service to the people or the maintenance of dignity, but who has won in Iraq, confirms the opposite. From this standpoint, the Iraqi government if it succeeds in providing the needs of Iraqi citizens, they often Stvtakr recorded a bright spot in her, and surely it would be this point in its favor during the next parliamentary elections to be held on the fifteenth of the month of January next.
The fact of the matter is sought by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki personally, because he wants to achieve with the success of the provincial councils in elections held early this year through the list of "state of law" or more. So that it can constitute a powerful bloc within the Iraqi parliament will again qualify to stay on as prime minister during the next electoral cycle, which will be pivotal as seen by many.
The second limitation of the arms represents the fear of the government actors and the political process in support of the Government in most of the decisions and steps to increase the violence in the country and take advantage of opponents of the government and the political process, this is for their benefit, making it once again demanding the return of American troops in the Iraqi cities for the re - control of the security situation. Especially as the Iraqi government and parliamentary committees in parliament, the Iraqi fear of interference from some of the countries in the region in Iraq's domestic affairs and support for those countries opposed to the political process in order to undermine or abandoned or returned to square one as a minimum.
But the Iraqi government and the leaders of the security services always stress that the Iraqi forces are capable of maintaining security in the country after the withdrawal of occupation forces from Iraqi cities and towns and that the recent attacks on civilians confirms beyond doubt the weakness of those who carried out the work, and that it is unable to meet the troops security and this is where a large proportion of health, because it is more than a year ago that no armed force in Iraq, opposition to the government and the political process to impose its control over the police station or a camp for Iraqi forces or the civil service and the like. Indeed, all played by the armed actors is off a car bomb or a suicide belt or a bomb or an armed attack on a military post, but what scares the Iraqi forces and their leaders that they are still subject to penetration by the elements of the former regime and al-Qaeda and the militias that work for actors and non-political Some are linked to political connections outside Iraq. If the Iraqi forces were able to immunize themselves from such intrusions made by the trust of Iraqi citizens largely do not fear the forces of law to deal with them, they will succeed in maintaining security within Iraq will not be any need to support by U.S. forces in the future.
However, there is confusion and possibly upset the tables on the government and the Iraqi security forces is that the question of the protection of Iraq's borders will remain, however, the American occupation forces, which makes the borders and perhaps try to secure the Americans if they wish to return to Iraqi cities and towns of arming and supporting the Iraqi groups, and non-Iraqi and incorporated into Iraqi territory to fight Iraqi forces, and depletion, and therefore will be the Iraqi government and its security is not in a friend or an enemy, which will contribute to the return of American troops in the Iraqi cities, the pretext that the Iraqi forces are not capable of maintaining security and stability in these cities, and this is expected very .
Iraqi National List led by former Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi's view that the U.S. withdrawal from Iraqi cities and towns is a national day for all Iraqis, not only to the government. Because the government and its president, Nuri al-Maliki not to take advantage of the withdrawal of their own, but they hasten to a genuine national reconciliation does not exclude anyone but murderers who shed Iraqi blood, thieves who stole Iraq's money, because without a genuine national reconciliation, there can be no real stability in the country.
Allawi's list and warned of the decline of the security situation in the country after the U.S. withdrawal from Iraqi cities and towns, said: "The security situation is sliding towards the poor, so it is better for Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to act to unify the positions of the political blocs, rather than of political propaganda by the issue of U.S. withdrawal from Iraqi cities and to him personally and his party's electoral list, also felt that the militarization of the list of Allawi's Iraqi army is still weak, and they tend to burden the American forces themselves, because they were not arming the Iraqi army are included in the calculations.
While the view of the Sadrist bloc of Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and has been an ally of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki at the beginning of the formation of his government in 2006, which disagreed with the Maliki later and have a lot of the detainees in the prisons of the Government as well as in the prisons of the occupation that the U.S. withdrawal from Iraqi cities It is Iraq in general is one of the key demands that have not and will not compromise the Sadrist bloc, but that the vacuum that will have the occupation forces must be filled by professional and non-Iraqi forces infiltrated.
The Sadrist bloc deputies through one of Baghdad's leadership that will replace the withdrawing Israeli forces have been committed during the past number of errors led to the deaths of dozens of innocent citizens.
She stressed that the duties of Baghdad to provide security for the citizens throughout the capital, Baghdad, and if you can not do this it must take urgent action and the alternative to prevent the targeting of civilian populations by preventing the citizens in the market, as happened in the market Maridi and Friday during the last few days.
The Iraqi Accordance Front, welcomed the withdrawal of U.S. cities, refused to cross a Kiedia, Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi, any attempts to delay the withdrawal of occupation forces from Iraqi cities, it strives to restore balance to the professional and the Iraqi security forces in the next stage and clean up the bodies of militia members infiltrated earlier.
In the opinion of the Iraqi Accordance Front, the Iraqi security forces to deal the same with all the national real Iraqi people during the next phase of these forces in order to be able to earn the trust of Iraqi citizens who will have a real help in the elimination of joints, full of crime, violence and terrorism. But the consensus breaks down fears that the security situation, which allows private groups to return to the practice of sectarian killings.
While the Kurds who are party to an effective and influential in the political process as well as in government, they and Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, who is one of the most prominent leaders have welcomed the withdrawal of American cities and towns of Iraq and called for the observance of this national historic day, at the same time, rejecting all attempts to thwart the joy of the Iraqis in this great event.
However, some Kurdish leaders fear the loss of some significant gains achieved after the occupation, especially that there are many issues that they wanted an early resolution of unresolved so far is the most prominent of these issues, the issue of Kirkuk, which could be considered the greatest dilemma in the coming stage, especially that the Arabs and Turkmen Kirkuk want the presence of Iraqi forces from the center and south of the country are in Kirkuk after the withdrawal of occupation forces and this is met with refusal by the Kurds, as well as there are many disputed areas in Kirkuk, Mosul and Diyala, have not yet been resolved, which may cause problems between the strong central government in between Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government.
http://74.125.19.132/translate_c?hl=...YitD_34irBNMRA

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum